CRA resolution to disclaim taxpayer late-filing aid despatched again for assessment


Jamie Golombek: Court docket says CRA was ‘unreasonable’ and conclusion ‘not justified, clear or intelligible’

Article content material

When you personal international investments whose complete price exceeds $100,000 at any level in a tax yr, you’re required to file a Type T1135, International Earnings Verification Assertion, which covers apparent international property, corresponding to funds in a Cayman checking account, but additionally international shares held in a Canadian, non-registered brokerage account.

International securities held inside pooled merchandise, like Canadian mutual funds, or inside a registered account, corresponding to a registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP), registered retirement earnings fund (RRIF), tax-free financial savings account (TFSA), registered training financial savings plan (RESP), registered incapacity financial savings plan (RDSP) or first dwelling financial savings account (FHSA), are excluded. A international trip dwelling, like a Florida condominium, can be excluded supplied it’s primarily for private use.

Commercial 2

Article content material

Article content material

The penalty for failing to file a T1135 on time is $25 per day to a most of $2,500, plus non-deductible arrears curiosity, compounded each day, charged on the prescribed charge for overdue taxes, which is presently sitting at 9 per cent. If you’re greater than 100 days late in submitting the shape for a specific tax yr, you’re hit with an computerized late-filing penalty of the $2,500 most, plus curiosity.

That’s what occurred to an Alberta taxpayer who filed her T1135s for the 2015 and 2016 tax years in 2020. The Canada Income Company assessed the taxpayer penalties and curiosity totalling about $6,000 for not submitting the 2 T1135s on time.

After being assessed, the taxpayer wrote to the CRA requesting aid from the penalties and curiosity. She supplied medical data to the CRA about her and her husband’s well being conditions and described the long-standing challenges she was experiencing in areas corresponding to decision-making, time administration and accuracy, which made it troublesome for her to hold out advanced duties, corresponding to submitting tax returns. It additionally described well being points skilled by her partner, which restricted his potential to help the taxpayer and required the taxpayer to look after him.

Article content material

Commercial 3

Article content material

However this wasn’t adequate for the CRA, which denied her request for aid, concluding that the couple’s medical state of affairs mustn’t have prevented them from submitting the required types on time. The officer famous the taxpayer was able to operating her enterprise, which, within the officer’s opinion, was of “comparable complexity” to submitting tax returns.

The CRA officer additionally thought-about whether or not the taxpayer “had acted shortly” to treatment her failure to file her T1135s. Since she was in a position to file her 2017 and 2018 types on time, the officer concluded there was no justification for her failing to file her 2015 and 2016 types after they have been due.

However the proof confirmed the taxpayer in 2019 contacted the CRA in search of affirmation as to which T1135s have been lacking. She didn’t obtain a response and wrote to the CRA once more within the spring of 2020. The CRA responded in July 2020 and the taxpayer supplied the excellent T1135s by August 2020. The “delay” in submitting was partly attributable to the CRA’s late response to the taxpayer’s inquiries.

The taxpayer requested a secondary assessment by a unique CRA officer and supplied extra medical data to the CRA. That second assessment officer additionally refused to grant aid. The taxpayer, feeling that the CRA officer’s resolution was unreasonable as a result of it didn’t take correct account of her medical circumstances, appealed the choice to Federal Court docket. The court docket’s position, as in prior such T1135 circumstances, is to find out whether or not the CRA officer’s resolution to disclaim aid was cheap.

Commercial 4

Article content material

A drop box outside the Canada Revenue Agency in Toronto.
A drop field outdoors the Canada Income Company in Toronto. Photograph by Peter J. Thompson/Monetary Submit information

In court docket, the choose reviewed the proof, together with the inference by the CRA officer that because the taxpayer, an inside designer, had been in a position to hold her enterprise going, however her well being points, there was no motive why she couldn’t file her tax types.

“It isn’t clear how the officer equated her potential to proceed to operate in that capability (as an inside designer) together with her potential to handle advanced tax issues,” the choose mentioned. “There may be nothing within the document that might help that conclusion.”

The choose additionally famous the taxpayer had beforehand supplied the identical medical data to a unique CRA officer together with a separate request for aid on her late GST filings. That officer authorized her request and cancelled penalties and curiosity for the 2015 to 2019 tax years, protecting the identical years for which the taxpayer had sought aid for submitting her T1135s late.

In the end, the choose needed to decide why two completely different CRA brokers reached reverse conclusions based mostly on the identical proof. Was it as a result of every CRA officer, having a level of discretion, weighed the identical proof in a different way? Or was it due to an error made by one of many officers?

Commercial 5

Article content material

Fortuitously for the taxpayer, the choose concluded that the CRA’s refusal to grant aid for the late-filed T1135s was the results of “defective inferences” from the proof that rendered the conclusion “unreasonable” because it was “not justified, clear or intelligible” nor did it reply “meaningfully” to the medical proof the taxpayer had supplied.

The choose allowed the appliance for judicial assessment and ordered the matter be despatched again to the CRA for reconsideration by a unique officer.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].


When you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.


Article content material


Postmedia is dedicated to sustaining a full of life however civil discussion board for dialogue and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Feedback might take as much as an hour for moderation earlier than showing on the positioning. We ask you to maintain your feedback related and respectful. We’ve enabled e mail notifications—you’ll now obtain an e mail when you obtain a reply to your remark, there may be an replace to a remark thread you comply with or if a consumer you comply with feedback. Go to our Group Tips for extra data and particulars on the right way to modify your e mail settings.

Be part of the Dialog


Leave a Comment